Our Mission


Gerrymandered maps, efforts to weaken citizen-led initiatives, and reduced accountability are part of a broader pattern: a slow erosion of democratic checks and balances. These shifts—regardless of who’s in charge—threaten fair representation and distort the public’s voice. At Better Boundaries, we’re working to reverse this trend, because voters should choose their leaders, not the other way around.


In Utah, the redistricting process is controlled entirely by the state legislature. After every census, lawmakers draw new boundaries for state legislative and congressional districts.

Following the 2020 Census, the Utah Legislature approved new congressional and state legislative maps that changed how communities across the state are represented. Among the most controversial changes was the decision to split Salt Lake County into all four congressional districts, diluting the political influence of urban voters and dividing communities with shared interests. The maps were passed during a one-day special session, without amendments and against the recommendations of the independent redistricting commission.

Public trust in the redistricting process dropped as Utahns from across the political spectrum questioned whether the maps were drawn to protect political power rather than reflect voters.

When elected officials draw their own districts, it opens the door to partisan gerrymandering. In Utah, this has led to less accountability, fewer choices for voters, and communities split in ways that serve politicians—not the people who live there.


Checks and Balances Are Being Dismantled


When the people or the courts push back, those in power sometimes try to change the rules. We’ve seen it with gerrymandering. We’ve seen it with efforts to limit citizen-led initiatives. And now we’re seeing it with proposals that weaken judicial independence and restrict access to voting. These are all symptoms of the same problem—elected officials consolidating power by removing the checks that keep them accountable.

Utah courts have ruled against the Legislature on several high-profile issues, including redistricting. In response, some lawmakers have proposed changing how judges are selected. S.B. 296 would have ended the long-standing practice of allowing Utah Supreme Court justices to choose their own Chief Justice. Instead, it gave that power to the Governor, with Senate confirmation, and required reappointment every four years. Legal experts warned this would make the Chief Justice more vulnerable to political pressure. Governor Spencer Cox vetoed the bill, saying it could force judges to think twice before ruling against the executive branch. Still, the Legislature passed it, signaling a growing trend of political influence over the judiciary.

Other bills target the power of voters directly. H.B. 300 moves Utah away from its widely supported vote-by-mail system by requiring voters to opt in and present additional ID. While election security matters, recent state audits found no widespread fraud. They did flag real issues like outdated voter rolls and inconsistent ballot tracking—critical areas the Legislature could and should address.

We believe in a system where power is shared, not concentrated. Whether it’s fair maps, citizen initiatives, the courts, or how we vote, the principle stays the same. The rules should serve the people, not protect those already in power.